The greatest problem in social accounting and reporting is
an apparent lack of valid and reliable measurement technique. Social
measurement often requires valuation of goods, services and effects that have
not been exchanged in the market and consequently do not have recorded exchange
or market prices. Exchange prices are considered to be the foundation of
business accounting. However, exchange prices are often not available and are
not very good indicators of social value. Therefore, some other measures of
social benefits and costs need to be developed. Social measurement requires the
estimation of benefits or utility provided by an entity, and the costs or
sacrifices imposed on elements of society. Several approaches for social
measurements can be used.
Surrogate
Valuation: When a
desired value can not be directly determined, a surrogate value needs to be
estimated, that is, some item or phenomenon that is logically expected to
involve approximately the same utility or sacrifice as the item in question.
Survey
Techniques: Survey
techniques involve obtaining information from those affected – elements of
society who make the sacrifice or who receive the utility – for measurement of
social cost and benefits.
Restoration or
Avoidance Cost: Certain
social costs may be valued by estimating the monetary outlay necessary to undo
or prevent the damage. Some social effects can not be undone and, in such
cases, the restoration cost estimate is supplemented with estimates of such
additional damage.
Appraisals: Independent appraisals may be useful for
valuing certain goods, buildings, and land. These will often reflect nothing
more than an expert estimate of market value and are, thus, analogous to
surrogate valuation performed by an outside expert. When appraisals are used,
it is necessary that we understand the basis for them and interpret the results
accordingly.
Analysis: Many times an economic and statistical
analysis of available data produces a valid and reliable measure of value.
Estimates of the increased earnings value of education have relied on present
value analysis of comparative earnings rates and life expectancies. The above
measurement approaches generally provide an adequate set of choice for
virtually any social measurement problem. They must be used, however, with care
and proper understanding in full recognition of their respective weaknesses and
especially with careful attention to the attributes that are ultimately
intended to be measured.
No comments:
Post a Comment